Comments on: transmedia branding http://whatconsumesme.com/2009/posts-ive-written/transmedia-branding/ marketing meets culture Thu, 17 May 2012 13:15:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Mike Arauz http://whatconsumesme.com/2009/posts-ive-written/transmedia-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-4688 Mike Arauz Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:38:36 +0000 http://whatconsumesme.com/?p=3547#comment-4688 See also: <a href="http://farisyakob.typepad.com/blog/2006/10/transmedia_plan.html" rel="nofollow">Faris on Transmedia Planning </a> and Faris' thesis: <a href="http://www.box.net/shared/qus47kip7x" rel="nofollow">I Believe The Children Are Our Future</a> See also:

Faris on Transmedia Planning

and Faris’ thesis: I Believe The Children Are Our Future

]]> By: transmedia branding / what consumes me, bud caddell http://whatconsumesme.com/2009/posts-ive-written/transmedia-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-4679 transmedia branding / what consumes me, bud caddell Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:28:14 +0000 http://whatconsumesme.com/?p=3547#comment-4679 [...] O­r­igin­al po­st­: tra­n­­s­media­ bra­n­­din­­g­ / w­ha&#1... [...] [...] O­r­igin­al po­st­: tra­n­­s­media­ bra­n­­din­­g­ / w­ha&#1… [...]

]]> By: Charles http://whatconsumesme.com/2009/posts-ive-written/transmedia-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-4667 Charles Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:35:35 +0000 http://whatconsumesme.com/?p=3547#comment-4667 I'm guessing Descartes was looking for the self evident proof a bit like Avicenna's falling man which preceded his thinking 800 or so years before the Frenchman. Not a lot of people know that. There's also a whiff of no publicity is bad publicity but then the notion of existence is a bit different than engineering conversations to create revenue. Nice slide though and of course, lots of bits in there that nobody has had to think about before, though McLuhan's idea that the notion of a public didn't exist till the linear fashion of the printing press is a stimulating discussion. I’m guessing Descartes was looking for the self evident proof a bit like Avicenna’s falling man which preceded his thinking 800 or so years before the Frenchman.

Not a lot of people know that.

There’s also a whiff of no publicity is bad publicity but then the notion of existence is a bit different than engineering conversations to create revenue.

Nice slide though and of course, lots of bits in there that nobody has had to think about before, though McLuhan’s idea that the notion of a public didn’t exist till the linear fashion of the printing press is a stimulating discussion.

]]>