<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: why foursquare must sell out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatconsumesme.com/2010/posts-ive-written/why-foursquare-must-sell-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatconsumesme.com/2010/posts-ive-written/why-foursquare-must-sell-out/</link>
	<description>marketing meets culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:22:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Nimeh</title>
		<link>http://whatconsumesme.com/2010/posts-ive-written/why-foursquare-must-sell-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6545</link>
		<dc:creator>George Nimeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatconsumesme.com/?p=4598#comment-6545</guid>
		<description>Good post, Bud. I agree with your points, and even if foursquare is fad as Bruce suggests, that&#039;s all the more reason for them to grab the cash whilst they can. Perhaps foursquare (the brand) is a fad, but the idea of geo-located mobile-based social networking is certainly not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, Bud. I agree with your points, and even if foursquare is fad as Bruce suggests, that&#8217;s all the more reason for them to grab the cash whilst they can. Perhaps foursquare (the brand) is a fad, but the idea of geo-located mobile-based social networking is certainly not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Wagner</title>
		<link>http://whatconsumesme.com/2010/posts-ive-written/why-foursquare-must-sell-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6525</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatconsumesme.com/?p=4598#comment-6525</guid>
		<description>Foursquare is over.  I think it was a fad.  It seems like a juvenile toy... after the first two weeks of playing with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foursquare is over.  I think it was a fad.  It seems like a juvenile toy&#8230; after the first two weeks of playing with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://whatconsumesme.com/2010/posts-ive-written/why-foursquare-must-sell-out/comment-page-1/#comment-6519</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatconsumesme.com/?p=4598#comment-6519</guid>
		<description>another consideration in your twitter no fees for branding vs. Four Square fees models relates to &#039;training&#039; the customers and users early in the companies lifecycle.  The fact is they (users/customers/advertisers) get set in their ways and when (if?) twitter moves to a more business driven model - there will be a significant backlash from users etc who have become used to &#039;Free&#039;. 

Weening advertisers and users early that the valued service comes with a slight price for that value is the smart move for the ongoing evolution of their relationships. 

The cash will also allow them too develop that technology innovation and value (read: barriers to entry) that you so rightly say are not currently in place...

Train your users and advertisers early that there&#039;s no such thing as a free breakfast, dinner or (ahem) lunch... even with badges! (Sorry...couldn&#039;t resist...)

Do you agree?

Andrew (Agency Nil)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another consideration in your twitter no fees for branding vs. Four Square fees models relates to &#8216;training&#8217; the customers and users early in the companies lifecycle.  The fact is they (users/customers/advertisers) get set in their ways and when (if?) twitter moves to a more business driven model &#8211; there will be a significant backlash from users etc who have become used to &#8216;Free&#8217;. </p>
<p>Weening advertisers and users early that the valued service comes with a slight price for that value is the smart move for the ongoing evolution of their relationships. </p>
<p>The cash will also allow them too develop that technology innovation and value (read: barriers to entry) that you so rightly say are not currently in place&#8230;</p>
<p>Train your users and advertisers early that there&#8217;s no such thing as a free breakfast, dinner or (ahem) lunch&#8230; even with badges! (Sorry&#8230;couldn&#8217;t resist&#8230;)</p>
<p>Do you agree?</p>
<p>Andrew (Agency Nil)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

