Comments on: your new job http://whatconsumesme.com/2010/posts-ive-written/your-new-job/ marketing meets culture Thu, 17 May 2012 13:15:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Caught Up In The System – by Neil Perkin | Die Denklücke http://whatconsumesme.com/2010/posts-ive-written/your-new-job/comment-page-1/#comment-18960 Caught Up In The System – by Neil Perkin | Die Denklücke Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:37:53 +0000 http://whatconsumesme.com/?p=4948#comment-18960 [...] rituals do not sit well with businesses that need to be agile. Bud Caddell talked about the complex adaptive systems that characterise the markets that organisations operate in. [...] [...] rituals do not sit well with businesses that need to be agile. Bud Caddell talked about the complex adaptive systems that characterise the markets that organisations operate in. [...]

]]> By: Show Me The Change » Blog Archive » Agility and Change http://whatconsumesme.com/2010/posts-ive-written/your-new-job/comment-page-1/#comment-7318 Show Me The Change » Blog Archive » Agility and Change Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:03:22 +0000 http://whatconsumesme.com/?p=4948#comment-7318 [...] and hopelessly rigid. Businesses increasingly operate in complex adaptive systems which, as Bud Caddell rightly says, are “characterized by perpetual novelty – talking of equilibrium is pointless, equilibrium [...] [...] and hopelessly rigid. Businesses increasingly operate in complex adaptive systems which, as Bud Caddell rightly says, are “characterized by perpetual novelty – talking of equilibrium is pointless, equilibrium [...]

]]> By: Sam Savage http://whatconsumesme.com/2010/posts-ive-written/your-new-job/comment-page-1/#comment-7193 Sam Savage Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:25:12 +0000 http://whatconsumesme.com/?p=4948#comment-7193 I like the post. In 2006 we formalized the concept of Probability Management, which makes use of a Chief Probability Officer or CPO. See www.ProbabilityManagement.org I like the post. In 2006 we formalized the concept of Probability Management, which makes use of a Chief Probability Officer or CPO. See http://www.ProbabilityManagement.org

]]> By: Your new job | Benton Barnett http://whatconsumesme.com/2010/posts-ive-written/your-new-job/comment-page-1/#comment-7185 Your new job | Benton Barnett Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:43:34 +0000 http://whatconsumesme.com/?p=4948#comment-7185 [...] Your new job [...] [...] Your new job [...]

]]> By: Your new job is to commandeer either one or all of these circles. « Soy un curioso http://whatconsumesme.com/2010/posts-ive-written/your-new-job/comment-page-1/#comment-7125 Your new job is to commandeer either one or all of these circles. « Soy un curioso Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:31:58 +0000 http://whatconsumesme.com/?p=4948#comment-7125 [...] Vía el blog de Bud Caddell [...] [...] Vía el blog de Bud Caddell [...]

]]> By: el rolio http://whatconsumesme.com/2010/posts-ive-written/your-new-job/comment-page-1/#comment-7122 el rolio Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:20:47 +0000 http://whatconsumesme.com/?p=4948#comment-7122 Bud, I really hope the good companies understand it. it seems slap-in-the-face logical to me. its what I think good companies should do internally, and I think our best clients prolly do it. its the behind the curtain type stuff that makes a difference. Plus, I like it cuz i know im all about that grey bubble and try hard to get better at the burgundy bubble. Whereas this blog is consistent proof of your proficiency in the peach bubble. So for our sake i damn well hope the good companies believe in this methodology. So a vote of confidence in your suggestion to formalise functions in these areas for the 21st century marketplace. #letsgo Bud, I really hope the good companies understand it. it seems slap-in-the-face logical to me. its what I think good companies should do internally, and I think our best clients prolly do it. its the behind the curtain type stuff that makes a difference.

Plus, I like it cuz i know im all about that grey bubble and try hard to get better at the burgundy bubble. Whereas this blog is consistent proof of your proficiency in the peach bubble. So for our sake i damn well hope the good companies believe in this methodology.

So a vote of confidence in your suggestion to formalise functions in these areas for the 21st century marketplace. #letsgo

]]> By: Anthony http://whatconsumesme.com/2010/posts-ive-written/your-new-job/comment-page-1/#comment-7121 Anthony Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:28:26 +0000 http://whatconsumesme.com/?p=4948#comment-7121 Nice post Bud. IMO Marketers should be leading the front on this type of role. This is what I find most challenging about running my own business. The desire to excel in these 3 categories, network, learn AND execute, all while being remarkable. If I were to join a company once more, they would have to show me that they are an "intelligent organization". Unfortunately, most of them are not.... ohh...and you just made my post today... cheers tony www.anthonybrogna.com www.flybyfilms.com Nice post Bud. IMO Marketers should be leading the front on this type of role.

This is what I find most challenging about running my own business. The desire to excel in these 3 categories, network, learn AND execute, all while being remarkable.

If I were to join a company once more, they would have to show me that they are an “intelligent organization”. Unfortunately, most of them are not….

ohh…and you just made my post today…

cheers
tony

http://www.anthonybrogna.com
http://www.flybyfilms.com

]]> By: Rich Nadworny http://whatconsumesme.com/2010/posts-ive-written/your-new-job/comment-page-1/#comment-7119 Rich Nadworny Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:41:21 +0000 http://whatconsumesme.com/?p=4948#comment-7119 I love the chess analogy. A friend once remarked that life is like chess: you have complete control over half of the moves in a game, yet absolutely no control of the other half. I imagine that most companies would gnash their teeth at trying to figure out how those positions would pay for themselves. A more interesting question is how much money are the companies leaving on the table by NOT having people like this? How would you calculate something like that? I love the chess analogy. A friend once remarked that life is like chess: you have complete control over half of the moves in a game, yet absolutely no control of the other half.

I imagine that most companies would gnash their teeth at trying to figure out how those positions would pay for themselves. A more interesting question is how much money are the companies leaving on the table by NOT having people like this?

How would you calculate something like that?

]]>