09 Jul, 2009 – 5 comments
NYTimes asks for funny money
According to Bloomberg, The NYTimes is currently surveying their readers about charging for monthly access to NYTimes.com – $2.50 for subscribers and $5 for everyone else.
In case you were living under a rock – the Times tried charging for content already – they dubbed it Times Select. Users paid $7.95 a month or $49.95 per year. Before ending Times Select, the number of Web-only subscribers fell to just over 221,000 in June 2007, down from more than 224,000 in April 2007.
Wired put those numbers in perspective, “But that was then: Way before the global recession, when the New York Times Co was worth four times what it is today, wasn’t selling assets and cutting its payroll, the advertising market hadn’t gone into freefall (the industry has lost more than $11 billion in ad sales since 2005) and Google wasn’t the enemy.”
This was also before independent publishers like the Huffington Post came of age.
Many of the op-eds I’ve read, such as this one from CNN Money, argue a NYTimes subscription model could accrue up to 750,000 subscribers – but that seems fanciful when comparing yesterday’s stats to today’s reality. Generally, these pie in the sky figures seem to risk the NYTimes brand on a shaky bet. The Times only has approximately 850,000 print subs, by the way (from the CNN Money article).
Beyond these foggy figures, charging for digital news has never made much sense to me. News is too universal. Sure, outlets can be scooped, but we live in the age of the cascade, where information disseminates, spreads, and ricochets in moments. Restricting access to this content will only hinder its ability to be spread, and as Henry puts it, “if it doesn’t spread, it’s dead.”
I have no doubt that if the Times did begin charging for content, some would pay. But again, living in our digital age, we have to also take in account the subscribers’ ability to spread that information, themselves. Imagine, a story is broken by the Times, Jason Kottke reads it through his subscription, and writes a quick blog post on the subject – which is immediately more spreadable than the original story. Or the Times breaks a story, it surges on the web, and CNN interviews the journalist or subjects of the story which only creates free, spreadable, content to compete with the original ‘premium’ and static text.
Pay models only inhibit the creation and transaction of social currency (which is more critical to a web business than a CPM rate).
Pay models like the one suggested by the Times, on their own, will only sustain themselves on a large scale for as long as it takes for their users to learn a new behavior and begin consuming content from other sources and move on.
But beyond pay models, why is it that the news business is so myopically focused on charging for the story itself? The people willing to pay the $2.50, or the $5.00, or the $7.95 aren’t only fans of the NYTimes, they’re fans of journalism and the news itself – selling them only bits of the news in digital text form is a gross undersell. Sell the news, in any form, in any medium, from any source, from any language, and sell what it means beyond the immediate news cycle. Build the apps, build the devices, build the future of news consumption. Put your crowd to use and sell its wisdom. Ultimately, there’s almost nothing the true news fan won’t consume if its good.
shared 12 Jan, 2009
If you’re a fashion designer or model who balks at the idea of being mortified on Project Runway for showcasing yesterday’s trends or too thick hips, then you’re in luck. Now you can say “You’re out” to Heidi and friends and head online for…[read in full]
shared 07 Jan, 2009
Ex-Yahoo Ryan Kuder started The Purple People Collective as a resource for newly laid-off Yahoos (and any other tech workers) looking to band together and find freelance work. The site, which launched last month, now has 100 listings including a few fr…[read in full]
shared 24 Dec, 2008
Fact: More and more people are shopping online.
Fact: Yet, plenty of people don’t shop online, because they really want to try everything on before giving up their Amex.
Solution: Norma Kamali’s site has just introduced perhaps the most brilliant addition to the online shopping experience since Net-a-Porter finally gave a wink and nod to shame shopping – the Try Before You Buy option.
Basically, instead of paying upfront for your online shopping gambles, you click for the Try option, get your clothes at home, then you have 48 hours to decide what you want to keep and what you want to give back. Shipping is taken care of for you (perhaps the biggest perk), and you only pay for what you keep.
Technically, this is better than shopping at an actual store – in addition to trying the clothes on your body, you also get to try it with everything in your wardrobe and in front of a mirror you actually trust, which is probably the best way to decide whether to charge the $4000 gown at left.
Can you tell we’re gushing?[read in full]
shared 22 Dec, 2008
Cable network Showtime is expanding its online presence, launching Join Showtime, a new site featuring full-length episodes and bonus footage from its shows, community features, and a “personality quiz” to determine which of its series you might e…[read in full]
shared 19 Dec, 2008
If you’re a fan of Rayban’s Wayfarer sunglasses – but never quite found their colorways satisfactory – then you’re in luck. Rayban is releasing the Colorize kit, which will allow you to fully customize your shades with different paint markers a…[read in full]
shared 19 Dec, 2008
We’re not entirely sure about their court performance, but these tennis shoes from Lanvin are certainly beautiful. The French fashion house has refined and refreshed a classic silhouette, using tasteful, toned-down shades to color the sneakers’ …[read in full]
shared 02 Dec, 2008
Paying for college is expensive. GradeFund, a startup founded by a couple of brothers from Harvard and Princeton, has an interesting new approach to covering at least some of the costs: rewarding students monetarily for making good grades.
shared 30 Nov, 2008
From his terrace on Colaba Causeway in south Mumbai, Arun Shanbhag saw the Taj Mahal Palace & Tower Hotel burn. He saw ambulances leave the Nariman House. And he recorded every move on the Internet.
Mr. Shanbhag, who lives in Boston but happened to…
shared 26 Nov, 2008
Ari Herzog (@ariherzog) is a social media strategist to business and government, and an online journalist. He writes about new media and online marketing at ariwriter.com.
I run into a brick wall when attempting to share RSS feeds with friends of mine …