Posts Tagged ‘Privacy’

the loss of public spaces

I haven’t read Jonathan Franzen’s new novel, Freedom, yet. You know, the one every is loving and or hating. But I am reading his collection of essays, How to Be Alone. And one of the essays, from 1998, entitled Emperial Bedroom, caught my attention for its take on the public’s concern over their ‘loss of privacy’ and for its rather prescient brooding long before mass adoption of social media.

I’ve always subscribed to danah boyd’s notion of privacy as a means of conscious control over information, not as a binary state of either off or on. And I enjoyed Franzen’s argument that privacy is an illusory right of a populace that is increasingly willing to trade privacy for attention, ease, and ironically, security. But more so, I appreciate his agitation that we’ve largely lost public spaces in which people curb their admissions of their private selves. You can’t grocery shop, go to a movie, or ride the subway without being exposed to everyone’s private conversations.

Here’s a question to debate …

Are we increasingly unconcerned with raising the attention of strangers because they themselves are increasingly uninterested in the lives of others?

privacy is control

danah boyd, in her recent post Facebook’s move ain’t about changes in privacy norms:

Privacy isn’t a technological binary that you turn off and on. Privacy is about having control of a situation. It’s about controlling what information flows where and adjusting measures of trust when things flow in unexpected ways. It’s about creating certainty so that we can act appropriately. People still care about privacy because they care about control. Sure, many teens repeatedly tell me “public by default, private when necessary” but this doesn’t suggest that privacy is declining; it suggests that publicity has value and, more importantly, that folks are very conscious about when something is private and want it to remain so. When the default is private, you have to think about making something public. When the default is public, you become very aware of privacy. And thus, I would suspect, people are more conscious of privacy now than ever. Because not everyone wants to share everything to everyone else all the time.

The evolution of technology is a progression of productivity, variability, and control. Generating personal content has gotten easier, creating polymorphic identities is now possible (business you vs social you vs dating you), and our social applications offer all kinds of control to allow that polymorphism – hence, privacy is a method of control over identity creation and management.

Saying privacy is dead is tantamount to saying identity is dead.

Jury Decision via Facebook?

A juror in the UK was unsure of which way to go on a difficult court case. In order to get a wider perspective on the issue, the woman created a Facebook poll to gather her friends opinions. A crowdsourced legal system? Sounds interesting, but unfo…

Casual Location-Based Dating via meetMoi

The online dating community has always been a vibrant patchwork of people seeking everything from a life partner down to a one night stand. Innovation in this market is often pursued by tough competition, but a new contender hopes to break away from …